The experiment was carried out in summer 2016 in a high-density (6 × 3 spacing, ∼ 555 trees/ha) olive orchard located near Sciacca, in South-western Sicily (37°29′56.8″ N and 13°12′13.4″ E, 138 m a.s.l.). Three-year-old self-rooted trees were trained to “free palmette” along a hedgerow in North-to-South rows. The experimental orchard is part of a large survey on the Sicilian autochthonous germplasm (Marino et al., 2019). Olive alternates high and low cropping seasons and this experiment considered only trees in an ON-year (heavy crop load). In this trial, the two Sicilian cultivars Nocellara del Belice (NB) and Olivo di Mandanici (MN) were selected for their different vigor and fruit characteristics (Marino et al., 2016, 2017). Trees belonging to NB have low vigor, spreading canopy habit and yield large fruit, mainly processed as table olives, whereas MN trees show high vigor, upright canopy habit and yield smaller fruit, exclusively utilized for olive oil extraction. NB trees are particularly sensitive to leaf dehydration (Lo Bianco and Scalisi, 2017) and to water deficit overall (Scalisi et al., 2019a). The soil was a sandy clay loam (60% sand, 18% silt, and 22% clay) with pH of 7.7 and <5% of active carbonates. Trees were regularly fertilized and pruned according to conventional practices.

Meteorological data were retrieved from the meteorological station of Sciacca (Servizio Informativo Agrometeorologico Siciliano). Reference evapotranspiration (ET₀) and vapor pressure deficit (VPD) were calculated using the methods described by Allen et al. (1998). Crop evapotranspiration (ET_c) was estimated by weighing ET₀ with an average K_c of 0.50 ± 0.05 (Allen et al., 1998).

Trees were irrigated at weekly intervals using self-compensating in-line drippers delivering 16 L/h. Four irrigation levels were imposed to generate a large variability in tree water status: full irrigation (FI) supplied with a volume of water equal to 100% of ET_c, and three sustained deficit irrigation levels at 66% (DI-66), 33% (DI-33), and 0% (DI-0) of FI. Six, four, two and no drippers per plant were used for FI, DI-66, DI-33, and DI-0, respectively. Trees were arranged according to a completely randomized experimental design, with twelve tree-replicate per cultivar, and three trees for each irrigation level. Measurements were carried out at stages II (pit-hardening) and III (cell enlargement) of fruit development, as during the stage I (mid-May/beginning July) spring rainfall saturated the soil and canceled any possible effect of deficit irrigation. Data are reported in local time.

Leaf stomatal conductance (g_s) was measured using a Delta-T AP4 dynamic porometer (Delta-T Devices LTD, Cambridge, United Kingdom) on three sun-exposed leaves in three trees per irrigation level. Daily measurements of g_s were taken at 2-hour intervals, from 0800 to 2000 h in a day at stage II (day of the year, DOY = 209) and from 0800 to 1800 h in a day at stage III (DOY = 287).

A pressure chamber (PMS Instrument Co., Corvallis, OR, United States) was used for the determination of Ψ_stem, on twigs covered by plastic and aluminum foil 1 h before measurement, as described by Turner (1988). Daily measurements of Ψ_stem were carried out on three twigs per tree, on the same trees and DOY of g_s measurements, at 2-hour intervals and from pre-dawn (0430 h) to 2000 h at DOY 209, and to 1800 h at DOY 287. Midday Ψ_stem was measured at around 1400 h, once a week from 196 to 287 DOY, and using three twigs per tree.

The fruit gauges based on LVDT sensors described by Morandi et al. (2007) were installed on olive drupes for continuous FD measurements. Gauges were wired to four CR-1000 data loggers (Campbell scientific, Inc., Logan, UT, United States) and data were downloaded manually. A total of 16 gauges (eight on each cultivar, two trees per irrigation level) were mounted on sun exposed fruit at medium canopy height (1.5 m above ground). In addition, early in the morning, LPCP probes (Yara International, Oslo, NO, United States) were clamped on sun exposed, mature leaves for continuous measurement of p_p. LPCP clamping was done a day after irrigation to ensure optimal leaf turgor, carefully avoiding central leaf nerves and placing the piezoresistive sensor on the abaxial side of leaves. The initial LPCP clamping pressure ranged from 15 to 25 kPa. Data of p_p were recorded continuously and sent to an online server through a system equipped with radio transmitters and a main GPRS/radio controller. LPCP probes were mounted on leaves nearby the fruit monitored with fruit gauges, using the same number of sensors (i.e., 16). Both fruit gauges and LPCP probes were mounted on the same trees used for g_s and Ψ_stem measurements.

Fruit gauges and LPCP probes were set to record FD and p_p at 15-minute intervals for 8 days at fruit growth stages II and III. A buffer period corresponding to the first 3 days after sensor mounting was discarded to allow adjustments and/or re-clamping in fruit and leaves. Raw FD and p_p data were processed using a 15-point convoluted spline function (Savitzky and Golay, 1964) to smooth the sensor signal and erase noise. Following data filtering, FD and p_p values were standardized by using z-scores [i.e., z = (x−mean)/standard deviation) to allow comparison among fruits with different initial diameter or leaf with different initial turgor pressure when sensors were mounted. After standardization, FD and p_p obtained from different sensors on the same tree were averaged. Second derivatives of FD and p_p were calculated to determine RR_fruit and RR_leaf as shown in Eqs. 1, 2, respectively. A standardization of RR_fruit and RR_leaf was not carried out as they are based on standardized FD and p_p, allowing possible comparisons among outputs from different sensors.

where, FD₂ and FD₁ are FD at time 2 (t₂) and 1 (t₁), and p_p2 and p_p1 are p_p at t₂ and t₁, respectively.

Diel data were subdivided in diurnal (0600 to 2000 h) and nocturnal (2015 to 0545 h) intervals. Subsequently, diel, diurnal and nocturnal statistical parameters were extrapolated from data series for RR_fruit and RR_leaf in order to find the best predictor of midday Ψ_stem. The parameters considered for each time interval (i.e., 24 h, night or day) were: (a) the minimum value (MIN), (b) the maximum value (MAX), (c) the summation of values at 15-minute intervals (SUM), and (d) the difference between MAX and MIN (RANGE). The relative standard deviation (standard deviation divided by the mean, RSD) was calculated as an additional parameter to allow comparison among variances expressed in different units. A graphical representation of all RR_fruit statistical parameters calculated on diel basis is shown in Figure 1. Similarly, all parameters were calculated for diurnal and nocturnal intervals. Raw data obtained from sensors that either caused damage to the organs or that were displaced by strong wind were discarded.

For each cultivar, the statistical parameters from nocturnal and diurnal timeframes were fitted into multiple regression models to predict midday Ψ_stem. A backward stepwise procedure was used to discard the parameters that did not significantly contribute to Ψ_stem estimation.

As expected, temperature (T) and vapor pressure deficit (VPD) were the highest in the measured fraction of stage II, as it occurred in full summer (Jul 8 to Sep 8) (Figure 2A). Relatively low T and VPD were recorded in stage III from 280 to 290 DOY (Figure 2A), due to frequent precipitations. In stage II, only sporadic rainfall occurred, and irrigation was approximately constant, ranging from 19 to 26 mm per week in FI trees. Lower weekly volumes of water were supplied in stage III due to the precipitations occurred from 252 to 289 DOY (Figure 2B). However, at this stage, precipitation led to an average higher weekly crop water supply (CWS, i.e., irrigation + rainfall) compared to stage II (Figure 2B). Specifically, in stage II the total CWS was mainly made up of irrigation water (Table 1), whereas precipitations at stage III contributed to the 63, 72, 83, and 100% of CWS in FI, DI-66, DI-33, and DI-0 trees, respectively.

The two cultivars showed different fruit shape (i.e., NB fruit were almost spherical whereas MN fruit were oblong in shape) from the beginning of fruit diameter measurements at stage II until harvest. Fruit size was also consistently greater in NB than in MN (Figure 3), with nearly no fruit growth during stage II in either cultivars, as expected in the pit hardening stage (Scalisi et al., 2019c). Stage III was characterized by a faster fruit diameter increment in MN compared to NB. The latter is related to the first part of stage III (i.e., the part shown in Figure 3), as in the remaining part of stage III until harvest, MN fruit reached an average final diameter of ∼16 mm. On the other hand, NB fruit reached an average final diameter of ∼23 mm at harvest, suggesting that they had a steeper growth after the end of the period considered in this study (i.e., after 290 DOY).

Linear regression analyses between fruit diameter and weight highlighted a different relationship of these two fruit parameters in both stages II (Figure 4A) and III (Figure 4B), as the slopes were significantly higher in NB than in MN (P < 0.001 from t-test) due to different pulp-stone ratios. These findings confirm once again the different fruit morphological characteristics of the two cultivars under study.

Results from daily g_s measurements carried out at 209 and 287 DOY did not show significantly different patterns between the 2 days of measurements and among irrigation levels. Figure 5 shows g_s trends in NB and MN at stage II (A) and III (B). In MN, an overall peak of g_s occurred at mid-morning (1000 h) with a subsequent sudden decrease at 1200 h in response to increasing noon T and VPD. On the other hand, NB leaves did not show a clear peak of g_s in the morning and kept stomatal aperture stable from 0800 h to 1800 h (Figures 5A,B), with a significant drop at 2000 h (Figure 5A). MN leaves showed significantly higher g_s than NB at 1000 h, implying a likely higher tree water consumption in the morning. This hypothesis is supported by dynamics of sap flux density measured with thermal dissipation probes in the previous year (Marino et al., unpublished), where MN trees showed higher daily water consumption, especially because of greater flows in the first part of the morning. In the afternoon, NB leaves showed higher g_s than MN, with significant differences occurring at 1800 h (Figures 5A,B), suggesting a tendency to maintain higher photosynthetic activity late in the day, when T and VPD are lower.

Daily curves of Ψ_stem at stages II (209 DOY) and III (287 DOY) showed the typical overall decreasing potential at solar noon in both cultivars, with a subsequent increase late in the afternoon (Figure 6). When tested with ANOVA, only Ψ_stem in stage III showed significant differences among irrigation levels and a significant interaction with time (i.e., Figures 6B,D), with the lowest daily values always occurring between 1400 and 1600 h and in DI-0 trees (Figures 6B,D). During the pit hardening phase (i.e., stage II), it is well established that deficit irrigation has little effect on Ψ_stem (Dell’Amico et al., 2012). The minimum Ψ_stem was significantly lower in NB (−2.53 MPa ± 0.03) than in MN (−2.33 MPa ± 0.03, P < 0.001). Pre-dawn observations at stage III suggest a different behavior in the two cultivars, with only MN trees fully recovering to FI levels during the night in DI-0 and DI-33 levels (Figures 6B,D). A rise of Ψ_stem was observed in NB and MN trees at 1800 h, with DI-0 MN trees recovering completely to FI levels (Figure 6D).

Weekly measurements of midday Ψ_stem from 196 to 287 DOY generally reflected the irrigation levels (Figure 7). Indeed, DI-0 trees experienced the lowest midday Ψ_stem both in stages II and III. As expected, midday Ψ_stem was higher at stage II than at stage III, although T and VPD were generally higher in the former (Figure 2). In this phenological phase, water deficit slows down the overall plant activity, inducing a reduction of vegetative growth and photosynthesis, which in turn might limit transpiration (Parent et al., 2009). Indeed, even g_s was similar in stages II and III (Figure 5), despite differences in T and VPD (Figure 2). Consequently, as water loss by transpiration is likely to be reduced, plants under deficit irrigation at stage II do not reach as low Ψ_stem as when the same irrigation is applied in stages I and III. The only exception occurred at 244 DOY, where DI-0 trees experienced a very low Ψ_stem in both cultivars, due to both particularly high T and VPD (Figure 2A) and to the transition toward the beginning of stage III which was completed the following week. In stage III, the sudden steep increases of Ψ_stem at 287 DOY was determined by high precipitations (Figure 2). Overall, the cultivars showed a significantly different drop of midday Ψ_stem in response to DI-0 (t-test P < 0.05). Indeed, across the monitoring period, rainfed NB trees showed a lower average midday Ψ_stem (−2.75 ± 0.07 MPa) than MN trees (−2.54 ± 0.08 MPa). Combining observations on g_s and Ψ_stem, it can be said that MN avoids excessive Ψ_stem lowering, not by reduced stomatal aperture, as g_s is significantly higher in MN than in NB in the morning (Figure 5), but by other mechanisms. Despite deficit irrigation, NB trees kept their stomata open in the afternoon (Figure 5), when ET₀ is highest, and might have not been able to limit water loss from transpiration, inducing low Ψ_stem. Marino et al. (2016) suggested that osmotic adjustments might be responsible of the relatively higher Ψ_stem in a clone of MN. Furthermore, changes in the leaf cell elastic modulus occur in other olive genotypes under drought (Karamanos, 1984; Dichio et al., 2003; Bacelar et al., 2006). Both osmotic adjustments and reduced cell wall elasticity contribute to turgor preservation (Patakas and Noitsakis, 1997) and might have led to the high Ψ_stem found in MN.

After removing the three-day buffer period from FD, pp, RR_fruit, and RR_leaf data, a 5-day interval in stage II was obtained (Figure 8). Trends of FD (Figures 8A,E) did not highlight different fruit growth dynamics among irrigation levels in stage II, for both NB and MN. FI induced sharper fruit shrinkage than deficit irrigation at 222 and 223 DOY, as fruit with an optimal water status are likely to exchange more water in the warmest hours of the day.

Dynamics of p_p highlighted the typical inversion phenomenon of the diel curve in olive leaves from trees under deficit irrigation (Fernández et al., 2011a). In NB, DI-66 and DI-33 leaves exhibited the half-inverted state (state II), whereas DI-0 leaves showed a total inversion of the curve (state III) (Figure 8B). In MN trees, a clear shift from state I to II was not observed, despite the slight tendency to enter state II at 219 and 221 DOY, with no apparent differences among irrigation levels (Figure 8F). This suggests that MN leaves can maintain high cell turgor, probably by reduced cell wall elasticity or osmotic adjustments, as found in other olive genotypes (Bacelar et al., 2009; Dichio et al., 2009; Lo Bianco and Scalisi, 2017).

The highest RR_fruit always occurred early in the night as fruit quickly rehydrated their tissues (Figures 8C,G). As expected, the most negative RR_fruit rate (i.e., the highest fruit shrinkage rate) always occurred in the warmest hours of the day. RR_fruit dynamics were also affected by deficit irrigation in NB, as the diel RANGE was greater in DI-0 and DI-33 than in DI-66 and FI fruit (Figure 8C). A completely different behavior was observed in MN fruit, which instead had the widest diel RANGE in FI trees (Figure 8G). In addition, the overall diel RANGE of RR_fruit in MN was almost double than in NB, implying larger water in- and out-flows per unit of fruit volume in the former, determined by high fruit sink power for water.

A general positive peak of RR_leaf was exhibited early in the morning (Figures 8D,F), representing a quick leaf turgor loss (i.e., RR_leaf is equivalent to the inverse of the relative change in p_c) after pre-dawn highest turgor in the 24-hour timeframe. Even in this case, the two cultivars responded differently to water deficit, with NB DI-0 trees exhibiting minimal diel fluctuations (i.e., RANGE) while MN DI-0 trees showing the largest RANGE. This suggested that the oscillations of RR_leaf might be linked to those of RR_fruit.

Another 5-day interval was considered at stage III of fruit development (Figure 9). Differently from stage II, FD responses were characterized by an evident diameter increase across the 5 days and within the 24-hour period in both cultivars (Figures 9A,E), as in stage III fruit are in full cell enlargement phase (Figures 9A,E). Daily curves of p_p (Figures 9B,F) did not show pronounced inversion phenomena, as this week was characterized by high rainfall (Figure 2B) and general higher midday Ψ_stem (Figure 7). Only NB DI-0 trees showed a partially inverted p_p curve. Diel RANGE of RR_fruit was found to be greatly reduced at stage III (Figures 9C,G) compared to stage II (Figures 8C,G). In the former, low VPD (Figure 2A) and good soil water availability determined by abundant precipitations (Figure 2B) led to an increase of water content in fruit and lower fruit water exchanges. For similar reasons, the diel RANGE of RR_leaf was reduced in stage III (Figures 9D,H), although NB and MN maintained the same differences in response to deficit irrigation levels observed at stage II (Figures 8D,H).

Considering the interesting findings from RR_fruit and RR_leaf dynamics, these two indices were further related to each other regressing their diel data at 15-minute intervals in a day at stage II (DOY = 223) and stage III (DOY = 287). Scatter plots in Figure 10 show anti-clockwise hysteretic relationships between RR_fruit and RR_leaf, both for NB (Figures 10A,B) and MN (Figures 10C,D). Hysteresis are common when relating outputs from different sensors of plant water status mounted on different organs (Tognetti et al., 1996; Fernández, 2017), as there is generally a lag in tissue water de- and re-hydration, and in our case, also a likely different pattern of the RR_leaf to RR_fruit relationship between day and night. An overall decrease of the hysteretic loop area occurred from stage II (DOY 223) to stage III (DOY 287) in both cultivars (i.e., for NB Figures 10A,B, and for MN Figures 10C,D). This is probably driven by the different fruit growth pattern at stages II and III which induced a reduction of the RR_fruit diel range (Figures 9C,G). In both DOY 223 and 287, the hysteretic loops in NB progressively flattened along the RR_fruit axis with increasing water deficit (Figures 10A,B) due to the change in the ratio between RR_fruit and RR_leaf. In other words, on one hand, at increasing water deficit and in a diel interval, it seems that NB leaves significantly reduce water exchanges, as the values of RR_leaf stay around 0 Pa kPa^–1 min^–1. On the other hand, increasing water deficit caused MN loops to flatten along the RR_leaf axis (Figures 10C,D), with MN leaves keeping high water exchanges at low Ψ_stem, while fruit water exchanges were significantly reduced, as RR_fruit did not change much from 0 μm mm^–1 min^–1. This opposite trend suggests a completely different mechanism of leaf and fruit water exchanges in response to increasing water deficit in the two cultivars, which might be driven by different osmotic adjustments, cell-wall elasticity and tissue water content.

The statistical diel, nocturnal and diurnal parameters of RR_fruit (i.e., MIN, MAX, SUM, RANGE, and RSD) were associated to the corresponding RR_leaf parameters to assess fruit and leaf responses to water deficit. Subsequently, data were analyzed by MANOVA to determine whether the combined response of parameters was affected by cultivars, irrigation levels, and cultivar × irrigation interaction. The cultivar did not influence significantly diel, diurnal and nocturnal RR_fruit/RR_leaf when statistical parameters were considered together (Table 2). Diel and diurnal RR_fruit/RR_leaf parameters changed significantly in response to irrigation levels, but the cultivar × irrigation interaction had the strongest effect (Table 2), indicating that RR_fruit/RR_leaf responses to deficit irrigation differ between the two genotypes under study. Specifically, the highest F was found in the MANOVA that tested diurnal RR_fruit/RR_leaf responses to cultivar × irrigation. These results suggest that, under increasing water deficit, the differences in genotype-specific fruit and leaf sink power to water are predominant in day hours.

Ratios between RR_fruit and RR_leaf diel, diurnal and nocturnal parameters were often linearly related to midday Ψ_stem (Figure 11). Interestingly, linear regression models highlighted opposite trends in the two cultivars for many of the several associations tested. In NB, RANGE_diel [diel RANGE(RR_fruit)/diel RANGE(RR_leaf)] was higher at lower midday Ψ_stem, suggesting more marked water exchanges (e.g., in and out) in fruit rather than leaves at pronounced water deficit (Figure 11A). An opposite trend was observed in MN, in which decreasing midday Ψ_stem lead to higher leaf water exchanges (Figure 11B). This inverted trend agrees with RR_fruit and RR_leaf fluctuations shown in Figures 8C,D,G,H. In NB, during the day MIN_diur [diurnal MIN(RR_fruit)/diurnal MIN(RR_leaf)] increased along increasing water deficit (Figure 11C). This indicates that as water deficit increases, the highest diurnal speed of fruit water loss becomes higher compared to the highest speed of leaf turgor gain. Even in this case, an opposite trend is found in MN, with the diurnal rate of fruit water loss being higher than leaf rehydration rate at low midday Ψ_stem (Figure 11D). In NB, SUM_noct [nocturnal SUM(RR_fruit)/nocturnal SUM(RR_leaf)] decreased with increasing water deficit, with leaf rehydration being favored over fruit water gain (Figure 11E). Oppositely, in MN the SUM_noct ratio was inversely related to midday Ψ_stem (Figure 11F), suggesting a stronger nocturnal sink power for water of fruit compared to leaves under more severe water deficit.

All the insights obtained so far suggest that fruit to leaf relationships in terms of RR_fruit and RR_leaf dynamics at different times of the day can be strictly related to midday Ψ_stem, thus, to plant water status.

The backward stepwise multiple regression analysis for NB indicated that most of the statistical parameters significantly contributed to the model in Eq. 3 (P < 0.05), and only MIN_diur, RSD_diur [diurnal RSD(RR_fruit)/diurnal RSD(RR_leaf)] and MIN_noct [nocturnal MIN(RR_fruit)/nocturnal MIN(RR_leaf)] were discarded. RSD_noct [nocturnal RSD(RR_fruit)/nocturnal RSD(RR_leaf)] provided the greatest contribution to the model (P < 0.001, F = 29.400). In the multiple regression model obtained for MN (Eq. 4), only four parameters were significant (P < 0.05): RANGE_diur [diurnal RANGE(RR_fruit)/diurnal RANGE(RR_leaf)], RSD_diur, MIN_diur and RSD_noct. Also in this case, RSD_noct represented the parameter exhibiting the most relevant effect to the prediction of midday Ψ_stem (P < 0.001, F = 24.569).

where, ^r = diurnal [MAX (RR_fruit)/MAX (RR_leaf)]; ^s = diurnal [RANGE (RR_fruit)/RANGE (RR_leaf)]; ^t = diurnal [SUM (RR_fruit)/SUM (RR_leaf)]; ^u = nocturnal [MAX(RR_fruit)/MAX (RR_leaf)]; ^v = nocturnal [RANGE (RR_fruit)/RANGE (RR_leaf)]; ^w = nocturnal [SUM (RR_fruit)/SUM (RR_leaf)]; ^x = nocturnal [RSD (RR_fruit)/RSD (RR_leaf)]; ^y = diurnal [RSD (RR_fruit)/RSD (RR_leaf)]; ^z = diurnal [MIN (RR_fruit)/MIN (RR_leaf)].

A similar highly significant relationship of RSD_noct and midday Ψ_stem was also observed in nectarine (Scalisi et al., 2019c), and in both cases (i.e., olive and nectarine), the relationship of RSD_noct to Ψ_stem was negative (RSD_noct linear components in Eqs. 3, 4), suggesting that the variability of RR_fruit at lower Ψ_stem is higher than the one of RR_leaf. In other words, being the night the fraction of the 24 h at which both fruit and leaf tissues import water, when trees are severely stressed, fruit water import are relatively higher than leaf’s when compared to the same relationship in no water-deficit conditions. However, the two olive cultivars under study show different patterns of fruit and leaf water-exchange regulation at other times of the day under increasing water deficit gradients. NB seems to favor fruit water exchanges over leaf’s when water deficit increases (Figure 11A), as indicated by the wide fluctuations of fruit water in- and out-flows in trees under DI-0 conditions (Figure 8C). At the same time, DI-0 leaves reduce their transpiration and water in-flow leading to minimum turgor gain (Figure 8D). On the contrary, MN leaf water exchanges become predominant compared to fruit under water deficit conditions, whereas fluctuations of fruit water in- and out-flows are wider than leaf’s in FI trees (Figures 8G,H, 11B). This differentiation in the response to drought is likely to be due to both fruit and leaf characteristics. Indeed, the water potential in NB leaves is likely to go negative, as suggested by daily g_s (Figure 5) and Ψ_stem (Figures 6A,B) trends. This leads to a higher loss of leaf cell turgor in NB, despite similar midday Ψ_stem to MN (Figure 7), as confirmed by the inversion of the p_p curve at 223 DOY (Figures 8C,D). In turn, the low turgor leads to a decrease of RR_leaf diel fluctuations. The most pronounced loss of turgor in NB leaves might also be driven by a lower leaf cell-wall elasticity in this cultivar than in MN, a trait that Bacelar et al. (2009) associated to less drought-tolerant genotypes. Concomitantly, NB fruit increase their RR_fruit fluctuations in DI-0 conditions, perhaps driven by high cell-wall elasticity, acting as the main pump of water, fruit-to-leaf vascular flows. The generally significantly higher midday Ψ_stem exhibited by MN can also be associated to a relatively higher water potential in the leaves compared to NB, as also in this case stomatal regulation did not differ among irrigation levels. The hypothesized higher leaf osmotic adjustments and cell-wall elasticity in MN under drought may also be confirmed by the low tendency to an inversion of the p_p curve (Figure 8F). In addition, the positive relationship between RANGE_diel and midday Ψ_stem in MN (Figure 8B) is determined by the lower fruit water exchanges at DI-0 levels (Figure 8G), which may be driven by lower fruit cell-wall elasticity in MN compared to NB.

The different mechanisms in the two cultivars were observed in an -ON year, and it would be interesting to further study tree responses in -OFF years, as Dell’Amico et al. (2012) and Girón et al. (2015) observed that in “Manzanillo” trees crop load influenced the ability of fruit and leaves to act as sinks for water. Changes in osmotic adjustments (Dichio et al., 1997, 2009; Lo Bianco and Scalisi, 2017) and cell-wall elasticity (Xiloyannis et al., 1993; Bacelar et al., 2009) along water deficit gradients have been reported for leaves. However, to the best of our knowledge, no consideration has been previously given to concomitant changes of similar drought tolerance mechanisms in fruit. Divergent physiological responses of fruit and leaf to drought might also be affected by different productive performance, fruit number and tree vigor. At harvest, MN showed significantly higher yield (Y = 7.30 ± 0.60 kg/tree), trunk cross-sectional area (TCSA = 51.3 ± 1.97 cm²), yield efficiency (YE = 0.14 ± 0.01 kg cm^–2) and crop load (CL = 4562 ± 615 n. of fruit) compared to NB (Y = 3.78 ± 0.66 kg/tree, TCSA = 41.37 ± 1.49 cm², YE = 0.09 ± 0.01 kg cm^–2 and CL = 510 ± 100 n. of fruit). The greatly higher number of fruits in MN may represent a conspicuous water reservoir for the tree and be involved in a buffer effect on plant response to drought. NB compensates its low fruit number with an average fruit water content six-fold higher than MN (data not shown), for a total tree water storage in fruit tissues almost equivalent to MN trees. A divergent evolution of the two genotypes may have favored the development of diversified protective mechanisms that control fruit and leaf water exchanges under drought.